| Tech Support Got a question about a Turbonetics product...here's the place to ask it. |
 |
|

10-08-2011, 02:33 PM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9
|
|
Robert,
A real conundrum. A larger WG didnt solve anything. But I kinda knew that since the pressure ratio was too low. However I have some new info and a choice to make and I wouldnt mind some help.
Placing the T72 with a 68 Ex and a 69 AR saw regulation return to normal. So I borrowed 2 more billet turbos.
The HPC 64 with a 68 Ex and a 69 AR saw the return of regulation problems. The 9 psi spring saw regulation at 17 Psi of boost. Too High. The Pressure ratio was about 1.25:1. Which is just too low for decent boost regulation on the street.
The next Turbo tried was a HPC 64 with a 65 Ex and a 69 AR. This generates proper regulation around 10 psi of boost. The pressure ratio balanced out at 1.5:1, which is where it should be. However the 69 AR is too restrictive for my application so I have to choose another Turbo. I must now buy as im out of borrowing options.
So I'd like to stay with the billet wheel, so i think my choices would be narrowed to two options.
1) HPC 64 with a 62 Ex and a 91 AR
Or
2) HPC 69 with a 62 Ex and a 81 AR
So you can see my dilemma. Can you offer any clear advice in make this choice? There are no compressor maps for these unit so Im flying by the seat of my pants and not enjoying it.
|

10-08-2011, 03:16 PM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9
|
|
Fyi,
I thought the Evolution WG was 38. You thought it was 35. In actual fact, its less than 32.
Thats the valve seat passage being measured. The entire bore is 31.60.
|

10-08-2011, 09:03 PM
|
 |
Administrator
Turbonetics Owners Club Staff
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,397
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OCD_Performance
Robert,
A real conundrum. A larger WG didnt solve anything. But I kinda knew that since the pressure ratio was too low. However I have some new info and a choice to make and I wouldnt mind some help.
Placing the T72 with a 68 Ex and a 69 AR saw regulation return to normal. So I borrowed 2 more billet turbos.
The HPC 64 with a 68 Ex and a 69 AR saw the return of regulation problems. The 9 psi spring saw regulation at 17 Psi of boost. Too High. The Pressure ratio was about 1.25:1. Which is just too low for decent boost regulation on the street.
The next Turbo tried was a HPC 64 with a 65 Ex and a 69 AR. This generates proper regulation around 10 psi of boost. The pressure ratio balanced out at 1.5:1, which is where it should be. However the 69 AR is too restrictive for my application so I have to choose another Turbo. I must now buy as im out of borrowing options.
So I'd like to stay with the billet wheel, so i think my choices would be narrowed to two options.
1) HPC 64 with a 62 Ex and a 91 AR
Or
2) HPC 69 with a 62 Ex and a 81 AR
So you can see my dilemma. Can you offer any clear advice in make this choice? There are no compressor maps for these unit so Im flying by the seat of my pants and not enjoying it.
|
It sounds like the 64mm unit worked well for you so id go that route. As for the evolution the valve itself is 35mm but the outlet is 32mm I believe
Sent from my MB860 using Tapatalk
__________________
2004 Nissan Titan SE KC 4X2: AEM Brute Force Intake, NISMO Exhaust, NISMO Shock Kit, PRG Upper Control Arms, PRG Sway Bar Endlinks, PRG LCA Spacers, Eagle Alloy 17x8, Nitto Terra Grappler 295/75/17, Alpine iXA-W404, Apline Power Pack, Apline KCE-400BT, Alpine Imprint, Alpine Type-R Door Speakers, US Amps USA-400, JBL GTO0804
2004 Nissan 350Z: Turbonetics Stage 1 Turbo System, Apexi WS2, HKS LS+ Coilovers with Swift Springs, Hotchkis Sway Bars, NISMO LSD, NISMO Diff Cover, ACT Clutch, JWT Flywheel, GSpec Short Shifter, Hawk HPS pads, Blitz Upper Raditor Hose, Motordyne 5/16" Plenum Spacer, Volk LE37T 19x8.5 and 19x10.5, Blitz FATT DCIII
|

10-09-2011, 07:40 AM
|
|
Newbie
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 9
|
|
So,
Which is better and why?
a) Stay with the 64 with a 65 Ex and a 69 AR.
or
b) Go to a 64 with a 62 Ex and a 91 AR.
Which flows better? How will this effect spool? Top end differences?
Cheers
|

10-10-2011, 09:55 AM
|
 |
Administrator
Turbonetics Owners Club Staff
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,397
|
|
The F1-65 turbine is physically larger and capable of flowing more air in the future if needed. Going with either one is going to get you what you want but only the 65 would have room to grow for the future.
__________________
2004 Nissan Titan SE KC 4X2: AEM Brute Force Intake, NISMO Exhaust, NISMO Shock Kit, PRG Upper Control Arms, PRG Sway Bar Endlinks, PRG LCA Spacers, Eagle Alloy 17x8, Nitto Terra Grappler 295/75/17, Alpine iXA-W404, Apline Power Pack, Apline KCE-400BT, Alpine Imprint, Alpine Type-R Door Speakers, US Amps USA-400, JBL GTO0804
2004 Nissan 350Z: Turbonetics Stage 1 Turbo System, Apexi WS2, HKS LS+ Coilovers with Swift Springs, Hotchkis Sway Bars, NISMO LSD, NISMO Diff Cover, ACT Clutch, JWT Flywheel, GSpec Short Shifter, Hawk HPS pads, Blitz Upper Raditor Hose, Motordyne 5/16" Plenum Spacer, Volk LE37T 19x8.5 and 19x10.5, Blitz FATT DCIII
|
 |
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:28 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2 Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0
|